Angsuman Chakraborty12 Mar 2005 07:58 pm
The Government today said: “The UN declaration is non-binding and has no legal status, but it calls on countries to prohibit all forms of human cloning. This is totally unacceptable to the UK government which strongly supports stem cell research, including embryonic stem cell research which involves the use of cloning technology. Stem cell research could lead to new treatments for serious and fatal diseases that affect millions of people.”
Source: Britain talks tough on stem cell research | The Register
Filed under Advocacy | 1 Comment
Related?
Stem Cell Research to be Collaborated Between India and Britain March 9th, 2006 New Delhi: India and Britain are likely to collaborate soon on stem cell research and clinical trials for finding cures to various illnesses, British Science and Technology Minister Lord David Sainsbury said. During a workshop held in India last year, scientists of both countries had expressed their desire to collaborate in stem cell research.
Stem Cell Research Funding Doubled in BritainDecember 3rd, 2005 Britain will double its spending on stem cell research to 100 million pounds in the next two years. Chancellor of the exchequer Gordon Brown said the funds will be invested in pre-commercial aspects of the research.
Umbilical Cord Cells Banking Gets Popular In BritainMay 16th, 2006 More than 11,000 British parents have paid to freeze stem cells from the umbilical cords of their newborn babies in order to grow body parts if their child becomes ill. Donald Gibb, a consultant obstetrician, fears that if he does not give his patients the option of storing their child’s stem cells they could later accuse him of denying them a cure.
Stem Cell Therapy to Prevent Strokes Held Up by US RegulatorJanuary 10th, 2007 ReNeuron, a British company developing stem-cell therapies, suffered a setback yesterday when the US food and drug administration (FDA) put the group's first clinical trial (for strokes in humans) on hold. The company had filed an application at the beginning of December seeking approval to begin testing its stem-cell therapy for strokes in humans.
Multiple Sclerosis Sufferer Could Move Again After stem-Cell Treatment June 10th, 2006 Presently stem-cell treatment is banned in Britain, but a multiple sclerosis sufferer who went abroad for stem-cell treatment, can now move his hands and feet for the first time in years. Rob Hodgson, from Elloughton near Hull, has been forced to use a wheelchair for the last 18 months and was unable to move the right side of his body.
TV ad sparked stem cell debate between Rossi and Gregoire September 22nd, 2008 The stem cell ad story starring Gov. Christine Gregoire sparked much controversy.
Researchers find Sperm cells similar to embryonic stem cellOctober 11th, 2008 The recent study published in the journal Nature talks raises the hope for a new source of embryonic stem cell. The source is likely to be free from any ethical controversy.
Returning Hope hopes to offer stem cell treatment of blindnessApril 23rd, 2009 Returning Hope, a pioneering Asian adult stem cell treatment portal, is expected to be one of the first in the world to offer the stem cell treatment for blindness. While very recently British scientists just have announced about the technique for curing macular-degeneration related blindness with adult stem cells.
One Response
Leave a Comment
August 1st, 2006 at 6:40 am
If a fertilized egg is a life and using the same in research is unethical then we have lots of unethical substances more grievous in our daily life to deal with if we should call ourselves ‘ethically clean’. In the first place let’s stop eating as we are killing animals. Well for vegetarians, again stop eating. Each leaf means life too. Stop all the animals from eating too to make them ‘ethically clean’ as we have laws and vetoes coming up to make us ‘ethically clean’. The animal trials of developing drugs or even generating antibodies in animals for human needs… they should be stopped too. These are ‘ethically unclean’ modes to benefit humans. Stop killing pests as they have the right to live too. Finally stop treatments of diseases. HIVs and microbes are living.
Can we associate the term ‘ethically clean’ to our lives? It’s a big ‘NO’. And should we at all try? Well it’s a big question to debate on. One half of us will say ‘yes’ as we have developed a brain to be more humane and more rationale beings. The other half of us will say ‘no’ stating - can we deny the fact that we are animals, however social we are? In the second scenario, we have to think of ways to benefit our own race against all odds to survive. And the truth is the ethical activists fall in our race too. They too need medication when they contract flu!
If one of us develops a heart problem how would he/she feel when there’s a replacement available to get a new lease of life? Well in other words stem cell research has the potential to give a new lease of life to the human race and to ‘other animals’ too. Any scientific advancement has an evil side to it. Developing nuclear technology is essential for benefit of mankind but it has the potential to end the same mankind. Has that stopped us from research on the nuclear technology? Rather we have a stringent control on research on nuclear technology. We need a control on stem cell research too. But that doesn’t mean we need to ban the research on stem cells.
Abortion of fetus is still allowed in most of the countries if the fetus is prior to achieving a certain stage. In that case stem cell research is more than ‘ethically clean’. Finally, who decides what is ethically clean in biology? Being a biologist I would rather like to give that privilege to the leading biologists from around the world and not the so-called ‘ethically cleaner’ people.
Let the brains have brains to decide on the animal we are and not be ethically subdued with bioethics.